By ASEEM R. SHUKLA, MD

The impending closure of
Hahnemann University Hospital is a local tragedy.  Eliminating a 170-year
old institution is certain to exaggerate the daily travails of the economically
disadvantaged inner-city population that Hahnemann serves as a safety-net
hospital.  The closure is also a national tragedy. Hospitals are the
towering, visible monuments of our healthcare system, and closings imply that
something insidious ails that very system—that all is not well.  

Hospitals are complex
entities with varied financial drivers, and the solution is never simple. 
And the moment is too rich for politicians who see Hahnemann’s failure as the
culmination of their dystopian predictions.  Bernie Sanders, most
prominently, stood on the hospital’s doorstep and pitched his deceptively
simple solution—Medicare for All.  Medicare for All, Sanders said, would
ensure that every patient carries the same coverage, hospitals are paid a predictable
rate, and voila, no hospitals need to close.  Private insurance would
disappear, and no one would be without coverage.  

Even physicians have jumped on the Medicare for All bandwagon.  Some
doctors insist that once profit is removed as a motive for hospital bottom
lines, and government bodies decide which hospitals can buy a surgical robot,
build a new wing or offer proton beam treatment cancer treatment centers, then
all hospitals will do better.  

But these arguments miss
a fundamental point: why pitch government insurance for all, like Medicare and
Medicaid (a federal and state insurance plan to cover low income adult and
children) as a remedy, when it is precisely government-run insurance that is
killing Hahnemann and other hospitals in distress? 

Consider: Medicaid
reimburses, on average, about 50% of Medicare rates, while private insurance reimburses up to 200% of Medicare rates.  It is
private insurance that keeps hospitals solvent through cost-shifting—charging
private insurance more for the same procedure or hospitalization than what
Medicare or Medicaid will pay. 

Of the patients treated
at nearly every major hospital in our region that operated at a loss last year, more than 60% carried either
Medicare

View Entire Article on TheHealthCareBlog.com